Canada. Rafferty-Alameda Project Environmental Assessment Panel

Zone d'identification

Type d'entité

Public Inquiry

Forme autorisée du nom

Canada. Rafferty-Alameda Project Environmental Assessment Panel

Forme(s) parallèle(s) du nom

  • Canada. Commission d'évaluation environnementale du projet Rafferty-Alameda

Forme(s) du nom normalisée(s) selon d'autres conventions

Autre(s) forme(s) du nom

  • Rafferty-Alameda Project Environmental Assessment Panel (Canada)
  • Canada. Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office. Rafferty-Alameda Project Environmental Assessment Panel
  • Canada.‏ Bureau fédéral d'examen des évaluations environnementales.‏ ‎ Commission d'évaluation environnementale du projet Rafferty-Alameda‏
  • Commission d'évaluation environnementale du projet Rafferty-Alameda (Canada)
  • Kanada Rafferty - Alameda Project Environmental Assessment Panel
  • Kanada. Commission d'Evaluation Environnementale du Projet Rafferty-Alameda
  • Commission d'évaluation environnementale du projet Rafferty-Alameda (Kanada)

Numéro d'immatriculation des collectivités

Zone de description

Dates d'existence

1991

Historique

Lieux

Statut juridique

Fonctions et activités

From the executive summary of the final report:

The Panel’s mandate, issued by the Minister, was “to undertake a review of the environmental and directly related social impacts (resulting from changes to the biophysical environment) of the Rafferty-Alameda Dam Project.” The Panel also had the mandate to review and make recommendations concerning mitigation measures and the operation and structure of the dams. ... The Panel include in its public review the significant and moderate impacts that could not be mitigated with known technology or for which no mitigation was provided as stipulated in Environment Canada’s IEE. Project impacts that were considered by the Panel included those intended and beneficial impacts that relate to the Project’s water management objectives, and other beneficial or adverse impacts not directly related to the objectives. There are several specific Project objectives related to flood control, water supply and recreation. Some of these objectives are in direct conflict with each other (e.g., flood control argues for keeping the reservoir levels low, whereas water supply argues for keeping the reservoir levels high). The conflicting nature of some of the objectives, the extreme variability of flows in the Souris basin and the apparent scarcity of water to meet consumption, evaporative losses and targets for apportionment to North Dakota, means that there is not much latitude in reservoir operations to meet all objectives.

Textes de référence

On February 5, 1991 a three-person panel appointed by federal Minister of the Environment.
On February 8, 1991, Mr. Justice Muldoon of the Federal Court issued an order requiring additional impacts were considered.

Organisation interne/Généalogie

Contexte général

Zone des relations

Entité associée

Archer, John H., 1914-2004 (1914-2004)

Identifiant de l'entité associée

PA 286

Type de la relation

d'association

Type de relation

Archer, John H., 1914-2004

is member of

Canada. Rafferty-Alameda Project Environmental Assessment Panel

Dates de la relation

1999-02-05 - 1991-09-30

Description de la relation

Zone des points d'accès

Mots-clés - Sujets

Mots-clés - Lieux

Occupations

Zone du contrôle

Identifiant de la notice d'autorité

Identifiant du service d'archives

Règles et/ou conventions utilisées

Statut

Révisé

Niveau de détail

Élémentaire

Dates de production, de révision et de suppression

2019-09-11 (Revision)

Langue(s)

  • anglais

Écriture(s)

  • latin

Sources

Rafferty-Alameda Dam Project : Report of the Environmental Assessment Panel. Ottawa: Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, 1991-09.

Notes relatives à la mise à jour de la notice

  • Presse-papier

  • Exporter

  • EAC

Sujets associés

Lieux associés